🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.