🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.